Utopian World Championship

T.R.O.Y. : The New World Disorder a global network of direct democracy and community currency

Summary: show/hide
Previous page |  Next page |  Page: 3 of 30 |
Jump to page: 
 

Page 3



POLITICAL ORGANIZATION


"Civilizing capitalism will only be possible globally, if at all."
Elmar Altvater


The Global Alliance
The Global Alliance (GA), is the name given to what arose from the World Social Forum http://www.worldsocialforum.org as it, and other NGOs gathered up the remains of the United Nations. Many grassroots organizations participated and structural advice on the new alliance came from groups such as the Campaign for a More Democratic United Nations http://www.oneworld.org/camdun
The GA came to provide a much-needed stability for the new structure of worldwide interaction and cooperation. All decision-making is now made through direct democracy wherein all participants engage themselves as equal members in a system of rotation that enables a minimum of bureaucracy.
Furthermore, it has maintained, from the very start, a highly flexible membership policy.


The GA allows for the creation and recognition of new nations and new 'states' according to a very basic criteria:
1) that it agree to the constitution of the Global Alliance which includes the ratification of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights http://www.un.org/overview/rights , International Covenants on Civil and Political Rights http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/a_ccpr and on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/a_cescr as well as Agenda 21 http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/agenda21
2) that it consent to monitoring by fellow members, and
3) that it sees to provision of the needs and welfare of its membership. Under these guidelines, nearly any community or group of communities has the possibility to be recognized as an autonomous entity.
Peacekeeping forces, comprised of GA members, are used no more often today than they were during the days of the United Nations and when they are used the emphasis is decidedly on dialogue and peaceful conflict-resolution. All parties are brought into dialogue and not, as was the case in Somalia 1992-95, only those parties who have military or economic power. Internal grassroots organizations, cooperatives, clan/tribal leaders, and cultural consultants as well as non-partisan mediators from outside the area are taken in. It is through the continual networking that goes on in today's direct democratic process that enables early warning s of tension build-up to be quickly addressed. Focus is thus more on pre-conflict resolution as opposed to the direct use of peacekeeping forces.
Immediately after the Great Fall disarmament became a top priority. If any sort of global security was to be established, it had to be free of the threat of military power and large scale war. The achievements of a universal ban on nuclear weapons followed by a ban on national armies were major victories. The model of Costa Rica which hadn't had an army in ages proved to be the shining example which everyone else followed. As the bans were simultaneous and universal there was little room for the military to protest. And as this coincided with the collapse of profit-oriented economy there was hardly any economic incentive to maintain military power and the arms industry.
Furthermore the GA, unlike the UN was neither dominated by nor dependent upon the United States nor did it include any sort of permanent Security Council membership as the UN once did. Direct democracy ensured that the voice of the GA was that of the people of the world and not merely certain heads of state.

 

Previous page |  Next page